Something I’ve been thinking about lately when it comes to stories is the current temptation of creators to only show things they condone.
for example. personally, I don’t swear. however if I made an historical film about the mafia I’m not going to have Scarface or whoever running around saying “those darn cops”. he’d say something like “those fuckin’ pigs”. Now from my personal views I object to what mr. Scarface says, I don’t think it compromises my views to show his, even if I may heavily disagree with it.
I feel like in this time and place in the world there is almost an assumption that any point of view shown, if not explicitly for the sake of vilifying it, must necessarily be agreeing or promoting it. I don’t think this is true at all. For example, I find no joy whatsoever in inflicting pain on others in my life, but in this comic a lot of people will die- and not in tasteful ways. guilty people and innocent people. this happening has been the case since the dawn of humanity and it will continue to be so until the end. Generally when I show violence in Motherland it is for a reason other than violence for violence’s sake. does showing violence mean I agree with it? I don’t think so. I’m showing something that is, you choose what to make of it.
of course it can be very hard to show events, actions, or what have you in your work without trying to provoke an emotional response one way or another, let alone to help a reader try and empathize with ‘the enemy’. with today’s ease of communication, everybody is [able to be] a critic and often feel an obligation to vehemently agree or disagree. it’s so easy now. being offended is addicting. being offended makes me feel powerful, as it requires you to change. I think the fact it’s so easy to spread your views (via social media especially) without any real consequence is a big reason why so many controversies get so blown out of control now. while I also don’t subscribe to the current notion that “everybody is correct, truth is relative to you”, I don’t believe that every minute controversy one is exposed to needs to elicit an immediate choice, especially one of extreme rejection or acceptance. true beliefs are much more than knee-jerk reactions. sometimes it takes a topic without a clear answer to come to your own conclusions. I just wish more people would do it, and more people would be open to it in return.
that said, of course not every creator will agree with my position, I can only point out trends I see and pressures I myself feel. And of course there is a time and place for the author to condemn or condone whatever trend or action or philosophy he or she feels passionate about – just as there is a time to present it but not necessarily comment on it.
i’ll have to give it some more thought. will probably talk more about it in a post later.
cal
2 thoughts on “Does showing an action condone it?”
Máximo Simancas
I agree with you. Suffering is part of human life, which is not always pleasant. Sometimes, showing a gruesome scene is crucial in making a character grow, or when you want to show how ruthless a villain (like the Renes) can be.
There is a tendency to soften stories, which makes some of them unbelievably bland. Violent content is not intrinsically bad: it can be really helpful to set a story apart from others.
By the way, great comic. Hope to see more of it soon.
Cal
Realized that I never replied to your post. Better late than never, I hope!
Those are pretty much my sentiments. People tend to worry a lot about peer pressure. That isn’t always bad, but it isn’t necessarily good either. I just try to show what I think IS and let people make up their own minds.
Thank you for the feedback. I hope you will continue to enjoy 🙂
RECENT